red fist

Unpacking Domestic Battery Charges in Cobb County

Domestic battery charges in Cobb County carry serious legal and personal consequences. Georgia’s complex statutes—combining the Family Violence Act and general battery law—create layers of legal requirements that impact how cases are charged and prosecuted.

Read More »
bail bond attorney

What You Should Know About Bond Revocations

Bond revocations can put your freedom at risk before trial. Learn how bond works in Georgia, common violations that lead to revocation, and how an experienced Cobb County criminal defense lawyer can help you fight to stay out of jail.

Read More »
theft by deception

Theft by Deception: A Closer Look

Theft by deception charges in Georgia carry serious penalties, but many defenses are available. Learn how prosecutors prove these cases and how a skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can fight for your rights in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties.

Read More »
probation revocation

Probation Revocations: A Closer Look

Probation revocations in Georgia can lead to jail time, but they are not automatic. Learn the process, defenses, and how an experienced Marietta criminal defense lawyer can protect your future in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties.

Read More »
child abuse attorney

Breaking Down Georgia’s Child Abuse Laws

Child abuse charges in Georgia carry life-changing consequences, including prison and the Child Abuse Registry. Learn the laws, defenses, and how a Marietta criminal defense lawyer can protect your future in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties.

Read More »
aggravated assault attorney

Aggravated Assault: A Closer Look

Aggravated assault charges in Georgia carry severe consequences, from prison time to lasting criminal records. If you’re facing charges in Cobb, Bartow, or Paulding County, understanding the law and your defenses is critical to protecting your future.

Read More »
security camera

Georgia Appeals Court Determines Whether Best Evidence Rule Was Applied

A Paulding County man’s conviction for armed robbery and aggravated assault was recently upheld by the Georgia Court of Appeals. The defendant argued that the Best Evidence Rule was violated because the state used photos from surveillance videos instead of the originals. However, the court found that prosecutors had introduced the original recordings, and the Marietta defense team’s appeal was denied. This decision reinforces how appellate courts in Georgia handle evidence and challenges based on trial errors.

Read More »
american flag in front of court house

Recusal of Prosecutor Weighed by Appeals Court of Georgia

The Georgia Court of Appeals overturned a Cobb County trial court decision in a case involving the recusal of a solicitor general. The defendant had objected to the prosecutor’s voluntary withdrawal, claiming no conflict of interest existed and that the recusal occurred without a hearing or her consent.

The Court of Appeals clarified that under Georgia law, a criminal defendant cannot object to a prosecutor’s voluntary recusal. The court also found that the trial judge lacked authority to override the Attorney General’s reassignment of the case to another county’s solicitor’s office.

This decision reinforces how Georgia courts handle conflicts of interest and prosecutorial discretion, ensuring fair and impartial case assignments in the state’s legal system.

Read More »
iphone

Georgia’s Appeals Court Explains Recidivist Sentencing

The Georgia Court of Appeals upheld a Cobb County Superior Court decision in a case involving recidivist sentencing after an armed robbery conviction. The defendant challenged the trial court’s use of recorded jail phone calls and claimed his attorney failed to object properly to the sentencing enhancement.

The Appeals Court ruled that the trial court acted correctly, determining the defendant’s prior Michigan offense qualified him as a recidivist under Georgia law. The Court also rejected the defendant’s claims of ineffective counsel, noting that the attorney’s performance was reasonable and that no objections would have changed the outcome.

This ruling highlights how prior out-of-state convictions can impact sentencing and underscores the importance of experienced legal representation in Georgia criminal cases.

Read More »