Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Criminal / Georgia’s Appeals Court Explains Recidivist Sentencing

September 26, 2016

Georgia’s Appeals Court Explains Recidivist Sentencing

Cobb Superior Court found a defendant guilty of armed robbery and denied him his motion for a new trial. The defendant believed that the trial court mistakenly allowed the prosecution to use recorded phone calls he made while in jail against him and incorrectly sentenced him as a recidivist. The defendant also found fault with his trial counsel regarding the recidivist sentencing.

Georgia’s Court of Appeals examined the case, noting that the “probative value of the recorded telephone calls was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.” The Court also demonstrated that the trial court sentenced him as a recidivist correctly because of a crime the defendant committed as a teenager while in Michigan. Because of this finding, the Court stated that if the defendant’s attorney had objected to the sentencing as the defendant claimed was necessary, then the objection would have been meritless.

The defendant claimed that his attorney also failed to subpoena eyewitnesses and bungled a detective’s questioning. The attorney explained to the Appeals Court that he assessed witness statements and found none that were useable in the defense of his client. The Court showed that the detective’s testimony did not “impermissibly bolster a witness’s credibility,” in spite of the defendant assertions otherwise. The defendant felt that his attorney did not question the detective sufficiently nor did the attorney object to or move to strike the detective’s testimony.

The Appeals Court upheld the trial court’s ruling and found the defense counsel adequate in his performance.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Is Domestic Violence a Big Deal?

It depends on who you ask. Most defendants don’t think domestic violence is a big deal, especially … [Read More...]

Breaking Down a Retail Theft Case in Cobb County

It’s a victimless crime. The store just writes off the loss. The rich manufacturer doesn’t care … [Read More...]

What Are the Crimes That Can Get You Deported?

Prior to 1924, between 10 and 15 percent of Americans were foreign born. Then, Congress passed the … [Read More...]

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Direct consequences of criminal convictions include lengthy incarceration, high fines, and extended … [Read More...]

Hit-and-Runs in Criminal and Civil Court: What’s the Difference?

These incidents have become increasingly common over the past few years, especially among pedestrian … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2023 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.