The Georgia Supreme Court has overturned the murder conviction of Justin Ross Harris, citing improperly admitted evidence. Learn how Georgia’s criminal appeal process works.
A criminal conviction doesn’t have to be the end of the road. From appeals to probation modifications and record expungement, Georgia law provides multiple paths for second chances. If you’re in Cobb, Bartow, or Paulding County, a skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can guide you through post-conviction relief and fight for your future.
Not all convictions are final. A skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can help identify trial errors, jury issues, or improper evidence that may overturn a verdict. Learn how appeals work in Georgia and how strong legal advocacy can protect your rights in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties.
When a conviction is challenged in Georgia, appellate courts often evaluate whether legal missteps truly impacted the outcome. In a recent case, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld convictions despite valid defense claims—ruling that the cumulative evidence was still strong enough to support the verdict. Understanding how courts apply the cumulative evidence standard can make all the difference in building or appealing a criminal defense case in Cobb, Bartow, or Paulding County.
The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a Cobb Superior Court ruling after finding that police failed to properly vet a confidential informant before obtaining a search warrant. The defendant, charged with trafficking methamphetamine, filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing the warrant was based on unreliable information. The Court agreed, noting that the police did not corroborate the informant’s claims or establish credibility, making the search unconstitutional under Georgia law. This case highlights the importance of probable cause and informant verification in Georgia criminal cases.
The Georgia Court of Appeals upheld multiple Gwinnett County child molestation convictions, finding that the defendant’s attorney acted reasonably under Georgia’s Child Hearsay Statute.
The defendant claimed ineffective counsel, arguing his attorney failed to object to several witnesses who testified about the victim’s statements. The Appeals Court, however, explained that the statute permits certain out-of-court statements made before a child turns 16, and that objections would have had no merit.
Additionally, the Court supported the attorney’s strategic decision not to object to a nurse examiner’s testimony, noting that doing so could have alienated the jury. The ruling affirms the importance of Georgia’s hearsay laws and illustrates how defense strategy and admissible evidence intersect in sensitive criminal cases.
The Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that a drug-sniffing dog’s involvement in a traffic stop did not violate the defendants’ Fourth Amendment rights, reversing earlier decisions from the trial and appellate courts.
The case began after police stopped two men for a lane change violation. During a routine identity check, the officer’s K-9 unit detected drugs, leading to the discovery of nearly ten pounds of marijuana. The defendants argued that the stop was unlawfully prolonged while waiting for dispatch to verify an out-of-state license.
