Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Criminal / Georgia’s Child Hearsay Statute Prevents Trial Counsel from Objecting

September 13, 2016

Georgia’s Child Hearsay Statute Prevents Trial Counsel from Objecting

Gwinnett Superior Court convicted a defendant of two counts of aggravated child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, and three counts of child molestation. The defendant appealed, believing that the evidence was not sufficient in supporting the convictions and that his trial counsel was not adequate.

Georgia’s Court of Appeals sifted through the evidence and determined that it was sufficient in supporting the defendant’s convictions. The Court also examined the trial attorney’s role in the case, and noted that the victim commented about the abuse from the defendant to several people who appeared as witnesses for the prosecution. The comments were made before the child was 16 and were deemed admissible by the Court under Georgia’s Child Hearsay Statute. The defendant felt that his attorney should have objected to their testimonies, but the objections would have been without value because of the aforementioned statute. The defendant also thought that his counsel should have objected to the nurse examiner’s testimony regarding comments that the victim made, but the attorney refrained because he did not want “to alienate the jury.” The Court believed this to be reasonable based on previous circumstances following the attorney’s attempt to object to a detective’s testimony.

The Court of Appeals supported the trial court’s ruling and determined that trial counsel was effective.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Reality TV Stars Guilty of Obstruction

According to a federal jury, before she was center stage in a slew of reality TV programs, Julie … [Read More...]

Uvalde Shooting Puts Terroristic Threats in the Spotlight

In the months leading up to this tragic school shooting in a quiet Texas town, the gunman apparently … [Read More...]

Hate Crimes in Georgia Increased in 2020

Thanks to a new law, the number of hate crimes that went to Georgia courts was up over 500 percent … [Read More...]

UCW (Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon) in Georgia

Rash of Mass Shootings Raises Weapons Possession Questions Regardless of your political viewpoint, … [Read More...]

What’s the Penalty for First-Time DUI in Georgia?

When people ask us this question, they’re really asking “How do I avoid the penalty for first-time … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2022 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.