Domestic violence is one of several criminal cases that also has consequences in civil court. In many cases, civil defendants in domestic violence matters have
Domestic battery isn’t just a misdemeanor—it can affect your record, probation, and even immigration status. Learn 5 important things a Marietta criminal defense attorney wants you to know in Cobb County and surrounding areas.
Domestic violence charges in Georgia carry serious consequences, including jail time, protective orders, and lasting stigma. A skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can challenge evidence, fight unfair allegations, and protect your future in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding County courts. Don’t face aggressive prosecutors alone—strong defense matters most when the stakes are highest.
Criminal convictions can do more than bring fines or jail time—they can also put non-citizens in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding County at risk of deportation. From crimes of moral turpitude to aggravated felonies, the stakes are high. A skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can fight to protect your record, your status, and your future.
Georgia passed hundreds of new laws in July 2022 that directly affect criminal defense cases. From bond to protective orders, see how these changes could impact your rights. A skilled Marietta criminal defense attorney can guide you through the legal landscape in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties.
Domestic violence allegations can carry life-changing consequences in Georgia. From stalking to false imprisonment to battery, learn how these charges are prosecuted in Cobb, Bartow, and Paulding Counties—and how a skilled Marietta criminal defense lawyer can protect your rights and build a strong defense.
The Georgia Court of Appeals has upheld the conviction of Tony Robinson, who was found guilty in Clayton County after a domestic dispute turned violent. Robinson threw a concrete slab through his girlfriend’s windshield while her young son was inside the car, claiming he acted in self-defense.
The trial court found insufficient evidence to support his self-defense claim, citing testimony from the victim and her son that she never attempted to hit him with her car. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, agreeing that “credibility issues” are the jury’s responsibility and that evidence of Robinson’s prior legal troubles was properly admitted.
