Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Ga State laws / Appeals Court Sees Through Convicted Burglar’s Attempt to Cloak Actions as Seeking Shelter

September 15, 2016

Appeals Court Sees Through Convicted Burglar’s Attempt to Cloak Actions as Seeking Shelter

Fulton Superior Court found a defendant guilty of burglary, but he appealed, explaining that the evidence didn’t support his conviction. He broke a porch door on the back of the victim’s residence and was removing the hinges of the door leading into the house when an officer arrested him under O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1, burglary.

Georgia’s Court of Appeals reviewed the case, noting the defendant’s explanation. He claimed that the trial court didn’t hear the possibility that he was entering the residence for shelter. The Court pointed out that the defendant did not offer any proof of that suggestion; however, “the presence of valuables inside the home support[ed] an inference of intent to steal.”

The defendant also contended that the trial court instructed the jury incorrectly by omitting the lesser offense of criminal trespass in the burglary charge, but the Appeals Court did not find any evidence to authorize that instruction. Because of this, the Court nullified the defendant’s complaint about his trial counsel. He felt that his attorney should have preserved an objection to the jury instruction omission, which the attorney would not have been able to do because the trial court was correct in omitting it. The defendant claimed that his counsel should have objected to the trial court’s answer to a jury question, feeling that the court’s answer shifted burden. The Appeals Court disagreed and found both the trial court’s and the attorney’s performance sufficient.

The Appeals Court agreed with the trial court and supported its ruling.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Check and Non-Check Forgery in Georgia: What You Should Know

Back in the day, forgery charges in Georgia usually involved forged checks. Clumsy forgers signed a … [Read More...]

Reality TV Stars Guilty of Obstruction

According to a federal jury, before she was center stage in a slew of reality TV programs, Julie … [Read More...]

Uvalde Shooting Puts Terroristic Threats in the Spotlight

In the months leading up to this tragic school shooting in a quiet Texas town, the gunman apparently … [Read More...]

Hate Crimes in Georgia Increased in 2020

Thanks to a new law, the number of hate crimes that went to Georgia courts was up over 500 percent … [Read More...]

UCW (Unlawfully Carrying a Weapon) in Georgia

Rash of Mass Shootings Raises Weapons Possession Questions Regardless of your political viewpoint, … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2022 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.