hearsay

Georgia Supreme Court Defines Hearsay in Prosecutor’s Indictment

The Georgia Supreme Court has clarified what constitutes hearsay evidence in a criminal prosecution involving alleged gang and racketeering activities.

In a case before DeKalb Superior Court, prosecutors attempted to introduce a federal indictment charging unrelated defendants as evidence in a Georgia RICO and Street Gang Terrorism trial. The State argued that the indictment demonstrated motive and criminal intent under O.C.G.A. § 24-4-404(b).

Read More »
child abuse

Georgia Court of Appeals Defines Elements of Child Molestation

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently clarified the legal definition of child molestation and what constitutes being “in the presence of” a victim under O.C.G.A. § 16-6-4.

In this case, Jason Prophitt was convicted in Echols Superior Court after spying on his daughter’s friend through a floor vent while she showered. The court found him guilty of child molestation, citing his indecent act involving a minor.

Read More »
DUi checkpoint in cobb county

Motion to Suppress DUI Breathalyzer Results in a Georgia State Court

The Georgia Court of Appeals overturned a Cherokee County State Court decision that had previously suppressed the results of a DUI breathalyzer test.

In the original ruling, the trial court found that defendant Scott Depol was too impaired to voluntarily consent to testing, despite having probable cause for arrest. However, upon review of the police video footage, the Appeals Court concluded otherwise.

Read More »
DUI case in marietta

Admission of DUI Breathalyzer Results

The Georgia Court of Appeals reaffirmed that voluntary consent is key when determining whether DUI breathalyzer results are admissible in court.

In this case, Lisa Kendrick was stopped for driving under the influence in Cherokee County, where officers read her the implied consent notice before administering the test. Although Ms. Kendrick later claimed she was not fully informed of her Fourth Amendment rights, both the trial court and Appeals Court disagreed.

Read More »
new laws go into effect

Court of appeals strikes down motion defining arrest

The Georgia Court of Appeals provided important clarification on what constitutes a lawful arrest and articulable suspicion in a recent case involving Michael Williams.

Police received a tip linking Mr. Williams to a theft and approached him for questioning at his home. When informed of the suspicion, Mr. Williams fled the scene, prompting the officer to order him to stop. His failure to comply led to an obstruction of justice charge.

Read More »