Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Ga State laws / Secondhand Asbestos Case Evaluated by Supreme Court of Georgia

December 9, 2016

Secondhand Asbestos Case Evaluated by Supreme Court of Georgia

A woman used to wash the clothes of her father, a retired employee of a city water department. Gray dust covered his attire, which she often shook off, unknowingly creating a toxic cloud. This process began when the woman was eight years old, and now, years later, she’s seeking compensation from the manufacturer whose pipes contained the source of the gray dust – asbestos.

Having developed malignant pleural mesothelioma, she filed a suit against the company providing supplies to her father’s employer. The trial court dismissed her case when the company asked for summary judgment. She then sought justice through Georgia’s Court of Appeals, which overturned the trial court’s decision. The case moved up the chain to Georgia’s highest court.

The Supreme Court reviewed the personal injury suit, noting that it had merit but not on the foundation provided in the initial case. The plaintiff made a failure-to-warn claim, assuming that the pipe maker was obligated to warn people of possible asbestos contamination. The Supreme Court asserted the trial court’s decision and eliminated the claim because the company “could not have had a duty to warn someone whose contact with the product could not be foreseen.”

The Court did, however, support the plaintiff’s other claim regarding defective design. The Supreme Court agreed with the intermediary court’s ruling, which stated that the case was originally dismissed because the trial court applied the wrong case law. The more suitable case for this claim includes a risk-utility test, which assesses “the reasonableness of a product design given the probability and seriousness of safety hazards.” The case used by the trial court relies on an employer’s duty to maintain a safe place to work without regard to third parties.

Georgia’s Supreme Court supported the plaintiff’s right to sue the pipe manufacturer.

Filed Under: Ga State laws Tagged With: Asbestos

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Thirteen People Arrested in Major Drug Bust

After they executed several search warrants in central Georgia, authorities seized forty pounds of … [Read More...]

Is Domestic Violence a Big Deal?

It depends on who you ask. Most defendants don’t think domestic violence is a big deal, especially … [Read More...]

Breaking Down a Retail Theft Case in Cobb County

It’s a victimless crime. The store just writes off the loss. The rich manufacturer doesn’t care … [Read More...]

What Are the Crimes That Can Get You Deported?

Prior to 1924, between 10 and 15 percent of Americans were foreign born. Then, Congress passed the … [Read More...]

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Direct consequences of criminal convictions include lengthy incarceration, high fines, and extended … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2023 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.