Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Criminal / Georgia’s Appeals Court Explains When Detention on a Boat Constitutes Miranda Protection

July 21, 2016

Georgia’s Appeals Court Explains When Detention on a Boat Constitutes Miranda Protection

Hall State Court found a defendant guilty of operating a moving vessel under the influence of alcohol (boating under the influence or BUI) and three counts of endangering a child by operating a moving vessel under the influence of alcohol. The defendant filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence of the field sobriety tests, but the trial court denied him.

A Georgia Department of Natural Resources officer stopped the defendant to inform him that his boat’s navigation lights were not visible to other watercraft and noticed that the defendant had been drinking. The officer asked him to board his boat so that he could conduct some sobriety tests, one of which was an alco-sensor test that yielded a positive result for intoxication. The officer arrested him and read the implied consent law, but the defendant declined to take the breath test.

The defendant’s Motion to Suppress was predicated upon his belief that he was in custody during the initial sobriety tests and was not informed of his Miranda rights. Georgia’s Court of Appeals disagreed with his assessment, noting that an officer may detain a person temporarily without invoking Miranda protection. The Court determined that the officer did not place the defendant in handcuffs or tell him that he was under arrest during the initial tests. The Court supported the trial court’s convictions and the denial of the defendant’s Motion to Suppress.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws Tagged With: DUI

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Is Domestic Violence a Big Deal?

It depends on who you ask. Most defendants don’t think domestic violence is a big deal, especially … [Read More...]

Breaking Down a Retail Theft Case in Cobb County

It’s a victimless crime. The store just writes off the loss. The rich manufacturer doesn’t care … [Read More...]

What Are the Crimes That Can Get You Deported?

Prior to 1924, between 10 and 15 percent of Americans were foreign born. Then, Congress passed the … [Read More...]

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Direct consequences of criminal convictions include lengthy incarceration, high fines, and extended … [Read More...]

Hit-and-Runs in Criminal and Civil Court: What’s the Difference?

These incidents have become increasingly common over the past few years, especially among pedestrian … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2023 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.