Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Criminal / Georgia’s Appeals Court Determines How the Role of a Tipster Transitioned into Participant-Informer

July 21, 2016

Georgia’s Appeals Court Determines How the Role of a Tipster Transitioned into Participant-Informer

Hall Superior Court found a defendant guilty of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, criminal attempt to commit the sale of cocaine, and use of a communication facility in facilitating a commission of a felony criminal act. The defendant appealed, believing that the State should have identified its confidential informant because he was “a participant-informer and not a mere tipster.”

Georgia’s Court of Appeals reviewed the case and discovered that the informant initiated contact with an officer, explaining how he could obtain cocaine from the defendant. The officer told him to purchase two ounces of cocaine and listened to the phone conversation of the sale between the defendant and the informant. Some officers accompanied the informant to the exchange, listened to another phone conversation for the exact meeting place, and then the informant identified the defendant as the person with whom he spoke on the phone to the police when they met. The officers found cocaine in the defendant’s possession and arrested him.

The Court agreed with the defendant that the informant should have been construed as a participant-informer. His involvement led to the defendant’s convictions of criminal attempt to commit the sale of cocaine and use of a communication facility in facilitating a commission of a felony criminal act. The defendant, however, also needed to produce evidence of entrapment and show that the informant’s testimony would have helped his defense so that the trial court would have permitted a taped interview from the informant.

The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court was correct in keeping the identity of the informant confidential and supported the court’s convictions.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws Tagged With: Drugs

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Is Domestic Violence a Big Deal?

It depends on who you ask. Most defendants don’t think domestic violence is a big deal, especially … [Read More...]

Breaking Down a Retail Theft Case in Cobb County

It’s a victimless crime. The store just writes off the loss. The rich manufacturer doesn’t care … [Read More...]

What Are the Crimes That Can Get You Deported?

Prior to 1924, between 10 and 15 percent of Americans were foreign born. Then, Congress passed the … [Read More...]

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Direct consequences of criminal convictions include lengthy incarceration, high fines, and extended … [Read More...]

Hit-and-Runs in Criminal and Civil Court: What’s the Difference?

These incidents have become increasingly common over the past few years, especially among pedestrian … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2023 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.