Marietta Attorneys Dean Phillips Law Office

Dean Phillips Law Office

341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, GA 30060
770-900-9175

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense Attorney
      • Assault & Battery
      • Bench Warrants
      • Burglary
      • Bail Bonds
      • Drug Crimes
      • Hit and Run
      • Homicide
      • Juvenile Defense
      • Misdemeanors
      • Probation Violations
      • Resisting Arrest
      • Sex Offenses & Rape
      • Stalking
      • Theft
      • Weapons Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Georgia Gun Trust
    • Gun Trust
    • Personal Injury
      • Brain Spinal Cord Injuries
      • Dog Bites
      • Distracted Driver
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Motorcycle Accident
      • Pedestrian Bicycle Accidents
      • Personal Injury Compensation
      • Reckless Driver
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Traffic Violations
  • About the Attorney
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Ga State laws / Eyewitness Credibility Questioned by Defendant in Hijacking Case

August 1, 2016

Eyewitness Credibility Questioned by Defendant in Hijacking Case

Rockdale Superior Court found a defendant guilty of hijacking a motor vehicle and aggravated assault, but he appealed, contending that the evidence was insufficient in supporting the convictions. The defendant also believed that the trial court charged the jury incorrectly and commented on evidence.

Georgia’s Court of Appeals examined the case, noting the defendant’s objection to eyewitness testimony. He felt that the victims could not have correctly identified him because their encounter with the wrongdoers was short, stressful, and occurred in a dark area, and the victims’ description was “largely limited to race and clothing.” The Court explained that the jury was responsible for deciding on their credibility, and it collectively chose to believe them.

The defendant claimed that the trial court charged the jury incorrectly by explaining that the prosecution did not have “to prove all of the acts listed in each count of the indictment,” but the defendant did not object to this omission during trial. The Court also explained that the jury charge issued by the trial court was suitable.

The defendant also believed that the trial court violated O.C.G.A. § 17-8-57 when it commented during jury instructions. The judge told the jury, “you now have a pretty good idea where things happened,” which the defendant construed as bias toward his case. The Court determined that the trial court showed the jury that the prosecution had the duty of proving venue and elements of each crime.

The Appeals Court concluded that the evidence supported the defendant’s convictions and that the trial court performed adequately.

Filed Under: Criminal, Ga State laws

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Is Domestic Violence a Big Deal?

It depends on who you ask. Most defendants don’t think domestic violence is a big deal, especially … [Read More...]

Breaking Down a Retail Theft Case in Cobb County

It’s a victimless crime. The store just writes off the loss. The rich manufacturer doesn’t care … [Read More...]

What Are the Crimes That Can Get You Deported?

Prior to 1924, between 10 and 15 percent of Americans were foreign born. Then, Congress passed the … [Read More...]

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions

Direct consequences of criminal convictions include lengthy incarceration, high fines, and extended … [Read More...]

Hit-and-Runs in Criminal and Civil Court: What’s the Difference?

These incidents have become increasingly common over the past few years, especially among pedestrian … [Read More...]

The Phillips Law Firm, LLC
341 Lawrence Street
Marietta, Georgia 30060
770-900-9175

Copyright © 2023 · Attorney Advertising. This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer client relationship.